The following provocative piece appeared yesterday in the New York Times Health section:

Investigating the Claim: Eating Local Honey Cures Allergies

Published: May 9, 2011
Many allergy sufferers believe that a daily spoonful of locally produced honey can act like a vaccine and alleviate symptoms.

ZDoggMD X-treme X-pert Analysis™


The original honey/allergy hypothesis stems from a single trial. The study noted that heavy local honey consumption was retrospectively associated with an absence of seasonal allergy symptoms, purportedly due to ingestion of local pollens and subsequent immunization to said allergens.

There were two minor flaws in the trial design:

  1. There was only a single patient studied in the trial.
  2. That patient wasn’t human.

Chief investigator Dr. Christopher Robin, a vocal proponent of feeding newborns vats of honey to prevent potential sniffles and itchy eyes, was later accused of falsifying data and coercing the trial subject (a Mr. W. T. Pooh) into unnecessary colonoscopies (don’t ask). Public health officials blame Dr. Robin for a dramatic rise in cases of honey-induced infant botulism. In addition, a British investigative journalist using the pseudonym “Piglet” uncovered a financial sweetheart deal between Dr. Robin and the American Dental Association (an organization poised to reap untold millions from the inevitable cavities associated with increased honey consumption). To top it off, subsequent trials have consistently shown no association between honey consumption and allergies; this is unsurprising, given that the original trial subject was a bear — a species that entirely lacks histamine (see footnote 1).

Despite this, Dr. Robin (who subsequently lost his license to practice medicine in the Hundred Acre Wood) continues to receive vocal support from legions of frightened parents — as well as from celebrity activist/allergy sufferer Tigger. Proponents of Dr. Robin’s discredited theories cite a “massive conspiracy” on the part of doctors, who they claim are “in bed with Big Pharma,” promoting toxic and lucrative allergy drugs instead of all-natural “cures” like honey. Websites such as Age of Sniffles and Generation Rhinitis continue to propagate these ideas, resulting in what many epidemiologists are describing as the biggest public health crisis since the Great Heffalump Outbreak of 1924.

Our expert take on all this? A spoonful of medicine still makes the sugar go down.

I have no idea what that means.

Until next time, ZDoggMD out!


Footnote 1: Actually, they may have histamine. I’m not a veterinarian, people.

8 Responses to “Allergies, Autism, and Honey: A Sticky Subject”

  1. Mama Tao

    I agree …for once. Babies do not need bee honey. All my darling cubs need is the sweet and sticky honey that flows from my bodacious Goddess bewbies!

      • Alice

        I think you should send your crack investigative team out for some of that ice-cream made with breast milk. Turns men into babies:)

  2. Doc Quixote

    Frankly, I always thought Eeyore looked like he had itchy, watery eyes.

    • ZDoggMD

      Eeyore is now the spokesdonkey for Zyrtec. Sellout.

      • Doc Quixote

        Well you know a Donkey gots to get paid!

  3. Alice

    Fair enough…will you write about bee stings, the immune system, and MS? Three of my close relatives have/had MS….I find it fascinating to study unconventional methods…and now that I see you have literary figures posting to add to comedic flare….well…..this is sweet than honey:)

    • ZDoggMD

      Hey now, Alice, I’m not a doctor, I just play one on the internet. Wait…no…I am a doctor. Interesting topics, will look into it…